Guest Blog: Can you teach science to preschoolers? Yes you can and why we must.

Young scientists enjoy a book with teacher Brandon

Can science be taught to kids younger than 5?  If you ask most people thirty years ago this question, the answer would have almost definitely been,  “No, they are too young to grasp the concepts of science.  Wait a few years, they are too busy playing.”  If you pose the question now, unfortunately many people may still agree with this, but the preschool educational community would beg to differ (as well as our allies).

I have been teaching preschool for over 6 years now.  I love it.  It is truly the most amazing opportunity in the world.  Each day, I get to spend my time with children who have never had a teacher before me or my teaching staff. Imagine that for a moment?  Being the first teacher in a child’s life.  We get so used to the idea of having teachers (especially as life long learners) but here in preschool, I am the first teacher.  In many ways, they form their opinions of teachers based on me, so I better be creating a lasting positive impression of who I am as a teacher!

These kids  have never socialized in a structured way with their peers, they have not yet learned the in’s and out’s of being a person in this world. They are still forming their identities. I am entrusted to be this gatekeeper (the one who either creates a positive,  encouraging environment or not).

This is a role I do not take lightly but the kids would never know this nor do they need to.  You see, my class is not about me, it never is and it never will be.  It is about them.  My role is a facilitator.  I help facilitate their play, learning, socializing, emotional development, language acquisition, dual language plans, cultural acquisition, negotiation skills, critical thinking, empathy, remorse, kindness, problem solving, behavior plans, special needs, development, respect, anti-bias and anti-racist learning’s through real life stories and scenarios (as well as a million other things that we do in Early Childhood Education).

The reason why I describe myself as more of a facilitator than a teacher is this:  if my students feel that the only one who can teach or answer questions is me, the teacher, than I am doing them a disservice.  I would be constructing walls for them where they may perceive adults to be the all-knowing and kids to be the all-asking but not knowing (and in a scenario like this, students are not encouraged to be critical thinkers).    I facilitate their learning basically like this (and you will see how this applies to the probing questions of science) in this real life exchange with my student Salif (name changed)-

Brandon- “…..and that’s why Jupiter is so big!”

Salif- “Teacher Brandon, does space go on forever?”

B-”Wow Salif!  That’s an amazing question! What do you think?”

S- “Well, I don’t really know.”

B- “You don’t really know because none of us know.”

S- “What do you mean, no one knows? Someone knows, right?”

B- “Well, there are scientists all across the planet who are trying to answer the very same question that you just asked. You are a scientist, just like them!  When you ask big questions like that, it shows that you are thinking very hard about things you want answers to and that’s what science is all about; asking questions that we may not have the answers to yet and the journey of trying to find those answers is what people have done for millions of years.”

S- “I’m a scientist!”

B- “That’s right you are!  So whaddaya say buddy, shall we try and answer some questions about the universe?  I think you have some friends in the class that are also scientists and may help out fining some answers with us.  Who can join your team to search for answers?”

S- “Well Kathleen is a scientist and she loves the planets too.  I think Pluto is her favorite.  She can help!  HEY KATHLEEN!!” (and he runs off to collect his newest partner in the search for one of the biggest scientific questions ever posed).

_____

Why have I illustrated this conversation?  It shows the importance in how adults talk with children.  Many, many teachers in my field get tired of too many questions or too many kids demanding their attention.  These teachers would have handled the conversation maybe something like this-

_____

Teacher X- “…and that’s why Jupiter is so big!”

Salif- “Teacher, does space ever end?

Teacher X- “Yes.  Space is infinite, which means it goes on forever.  We know it began 13.7 billion years ago in an event called the big bang.  That was a point where all of the stuff in space was all crunched together and when it exploded it spread out in all directions and that is where all of the galaxies and stars and planets comes from.”

Salif- “Oh.”

Teacher X- “Ok kids, now let me tell you about Saturn!”…..

So you see, Teacher X gave what is a logical and sound scientific answer but what she also did was she denied the student the opportunity to explore this concept for himself.  She taught him something she knew (or thinks she knows) rather than facilitating his learning.  This was a moment in time, where the student asked one of the most perplexing questions known to man (a question many deep thinking college kids never even pose) and he was not given the chance to dig in and find out for himself.  Instead he was fed a theory.  That’s it.  Merely a theory from adult astronomers.  Sure, it’s a pretty sound theory but none the less, an adult theory.  Salif would have not explored this topic further because he was not encouraged to.  The conversation was not there.  He asked a question, she gave a closed ended question and that was that.  Was she being rude? No.  Was she annoyed?  No.  She just gave an answer and moved on.  Teachers do not even realize what learning opportunities are lost when dialogue is not formed or when the discussion ends with an adult answer rather than a child thought.

Look back at my real life conversation with Salif in a moment.  You will see that the “answers” I give are all open ended.  They are designed to encourage a deeper level of thinking on his part.  Open ended questions longer than 3 exchanges open the conversation up and provide an opportunity to have the child really inquire and dig deep for his or her own answers.  Ok, go back and read my exchange and then Teacher X.  I’ll wait for you……..

___________

Ok, did you do it?  Good job, friend!  Ok, by now you should see the power of facilitating and open ended questions.  Now let’s talk deeper about how important it is for preschoolers to learn science (and I’m not just talking about why leaves fall, I’m talking much deeper stuff too like, “How do plants use our star the Sun as food?”  Or, “Why do we always drink cow milk at lunch time?” Both of these are real questions that have been posed by children, openeing up massive scientific dialogue between the children and our teaching team.

So why is science so important in preschool?  Won’t they get it all throughout school and be just fine?  Well, yes they will learn about science but without preschool science a few things happen (or don’t).  Let me explain:

Without science in preschool and the first 5 years of a child’s life, she will not be as excited to learn science later in school (or may not feel encouraged to do so):

When kids and teachers build a model volcano and “make it erupt”, there is much more happening than the children watching liquid spill out of the top.  If they have a facilitator teacher who encourages deep thinking about the processes of the chemical reaction, then that group is now talking about Chemistry (introduced in high school).  If that teacher asks why the “lava” flows up and then back down the sides and flows into a puddle where cracks had formed, we are now talking about Earth sciences of geologic forces, tectonic pressure and gravity at work (taught in middle, high school and college freshman courses).

Empower the young through science and you make a lifelong scientist:

So you want more people of color and women in the advanced sciences?  Start in my class.  I teach in a class of children who are (in this order of demographics) Chinese, White, Black, Vietnamese and Latino with the  gender population at about 50/50 (19 students all together).  If my team and I can get this group of young scientists to truly believe they can do anything in life and it is an idea that is reinforced throughout schooling, then you have yourself some very skilled and talented bright minds who will be ready to tackle things like Malaria and interplanetary space travel when they grow up.  Think I’m exaggerating?  I’m not.  I have a former preschooler who is now in 2nd grade.  He swears to everyone he meets he will grow up and be a pilot.  He already flies real model planes with adult enthusiasts weekly (youngest of the crowd by at least a decade) and builds Lego space planes.  Where did this all start? As he said directly to me and his parents “Teacher Brandon’s class!”  Keep it up young one, I’ve got my eye on your future.  May you have teachers that never dissuade you and encourage your deeper growth within aeronautics and engineering.  You can be anything you set out to be.

Science helps create children who understand the world they live in and seek answers for the things they don’t understand:

An exuberant chemist reacts to her reaction!

  Wonder, amazement, curiosity, excitement.  These are all words we use to describe young children, so why would we not capitalize on these attributes?  Teacher’s science lessons really begin to get in depth in elementary school but even then, we are talking about broad overviews and lecture; not scientific inquiry and exploration for answers.  Elementary school teachers give answers, a preschool facilitator helps the children create answers.  We have an expression in the pre-K world; there are no wrong answers.  Any answer is a good one when kids are thinking because you as a facilitator can encourage deeper thinking and deeper understanding.  If we tell kids, NO that’s not right or No, don’t be silly, you will see that that child will cease to ask and will cease to know.  You see where this can lead to by now.

If we wait to teach science to children after preschool we miss this window of excitement, wonder and curiosity.  Sure, kids are still excited and curious about the world around them. I still am and I’m well beyond preschool but the point is this.  IF we can use the first 5 years of a child’s life as an opportunity to plant all the seeds of science and then future teachers facilitate deeper and deeper learning as the years go on, then we will be looking at this next generation of American minds who once again lead the world in scientific exploration.  Who knows how much we impact or who will grow up to cure AIDS or walk on Mars  but I can tell you this; without the facilitation of deep learning in the early years, it is an uphill battle rather than a scientific journey.  Encourage the sciences in all the kids around you in your life.  Science surrounds them.  Help them to see it.

Brandon Blake is a lead teacher at the Denise Louie Education Center in the International District in Seattle, WA. You can contact him at bblake@deniselouie.org

Guest Blog: Transitioning from graduate student to faculty

“Cyber-SACNAS” caught up with Assistant Professor Tracie Delgado, a former  UW SACNista, to ask a few questions about entering the  professoriate. If you’re  interested in becoming a professor one day, Dr. Delgado provides some very good advice for you!

1) What did you do during your graduate career to prepare yourself to become a faculty member (publications, research, etc)?

During graduate school I made sure to make the most out of any opportunity I had. To start, I applied to various research fellowships throughout my graduate school career and was able to secure my own funding all five years of graduate school. I was not always awarded the first fellowship I applied for, but with constant dedication I was able to receive five different research fellowships while in graduate school including the GO-MAP fellowship my first year of grad school, the ARCS fellowship my 1st-3rd year of graduate school, the Viral Oncology Training Grant my second year of graduate school, the Cellular and Molecular Biology Training Grant my third through fifth year and the Microbiology Helen Whitely fellowship my last few months of graduate school. That did not include receiving honorable mention for the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Ford foundation fellowship. Other than applying for fellowships and learning how to secure my own funding for my research, I also published a paper my fourth year of graduate school, under the guidance of my mentor Dr. Michael Lagunoff, titled “Induction of the Warburg effect by Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus is required for the maintenance of latently infected endothelial cells” in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences (PNAS) journal. I currently have another first author paper in review for publication titled “Global Metabolic Profiling of Infection by an Oncogenic Virus: KSHV Induces and Requires Lipogenesis for Survival of Latent Infection.” I also made sure to attend and present my data at scientific conferences which included the “International Workshop on KSHV & Related Agents”, “International Herpesvirus Workshop” and SACNAS National Conferences. By presenting in conferences I was able to meet other scientist in my field as well as scientist from similar backgrounds which help increase my connections with the scientific community. Other than research, I was proactive in the area of teaching and science outreach. Specifically for teaching, while in graduate school, I taught two Microbiology lab courses at the University of Washington as well as taught a Microbiology course (lecture and lab) at North Seattle Community College. I also applied and received the Huckabay Teaching Fellowship from the University of Washington where I was able to create and teach a course titled “The Biology of Sexually Transmitted Diseases” at Seattle Central Community College. All these experiences together prepared me for an academic career because I learned to write grants, do research, publish papers, present my data and create and teach college level courses.

2) How did you navigate the tough academic job market?

My main advice for anyone trying to find an academic job is to network as much as possible. During graduate school I contacted and met with various deans of science programs at liberal arts colleges and community colleges in the greater seattle area. The main purpose of my meetings was to let them know who I was, what my academic plans were after graduate school and for them to keep me in mind if any faculty positions arose in the future. Through my networking earlier in graduate school I was invited back to interview to teach a summer Microbiology course at North Seattle Community College. The interview went well and I was hired to teach this course, which allowed me to gain experience teaching a course all by myself. During my networking, I also met Dr. Wendy Rockhill who is the science Dean at Seattle Central Community College (SCCC). Dr. Rockhill mentored me and was my faculty sponsor when I applied for the Huckabay teaching fellowship. When I received the Huckabay teaching fellowship, she allowed me to teach my course at the SCCC campus. This gave me the experience of creating a course from scratch and teaching it. With all this said, by the time graduation was closing in I met with the Dean of Arts and Sciences and Science Faculty Chairman at Northwest University and demonstrated my desire for becoming a faculty member at this institution. At the time there was no openings available, but a few months went by and a position for a tenure track Assistant Professor in Biology position opening up and they called me for an official interview. I was given the job and that has led me to where I am today. Without the power of networking, I don’t think I would have progressed to the point I am today.

3) What are the challenges of being a new faculty member?

Since Northwest University is a liberal arts college whose primary focus is excellent teaching, the biggest challenge has been preparing and teaching courses I have never taught before, all at one time. I strive for excellence for myself and for my students, so I work hard to give my students the best education and learning environment. Another challenge is transitioning from student to faculty member. As a student I had many mentors around campus to help and encourage me in my graduate school career. Now as a faculty member I need to be proactive and seek out new mentors at both my institution and elsewhere. A third challenge is to make sure to have “me” time. It is easy to get caught up in faculty life, so it is necessary to take a breath every so often and spend time with family and friends or just personal alone time to relax.

4) What are the advantages of being a faculty member over a graduate student?

I think one of the biggest advantages is being done with school and now being apart of mentoring the next generation of students. It is very special and rewarding know that students look up to me and I am teaching them skills that are essential for their future careers. Another advantage is not taking exams or attending lectures necessary to finish a degree. Now I can immerse myself and learn things that I find interesting, which allows me to continue to grow in knowledge as a faculty member and an educator.

5) What advice do you have for students who are looking to become faculty members?

I would say the best piece of advice is to work hard, network, make the best out of any opportunity and strive for excellence.

Tracie Delgado is an Assistant Professor at Northwest University in Kirkland, Washington. She graduated from the University of Washington with her PhD in Microbiology in 2011 and is a past president of the UW SACNAS chapter. Dr. Delgado’s CV is located below.